We are now 37 days into the Strait of Hormuz closure and the market is pricing in a reality that still feels surreal to me every time I pull up vessel tracking data.
Track tanker stocks live on TradingView.
Brent crude is at $141 a barrel. VLCC day rates hit a verified record of $423,736. Trump issued a Tuesday deadline for Iran to reopen the strait or face strikes on power plants and infrastructure. Iran rejected it. The deadline passed. Hormuz is still closed.
Let me break down what happened this week and what it means for the tanker market.
The Deadline That Wasn’t: What Trump’s Ultimatum Actually Changed
Nothing, structurally. Tehran rejected every component of the US ceasefire proposal. Iranian officials publicly stated they want a permanent end to the war, a full lifting of sanctions, and a structured safe-passage regime before they will even consider reopening the strait. That is not a negotiating position that resolves in 24 hours.
What the deadline did do was add another layer of volatility to tanker equities. Stocks that had been running for weeks saw sharp intraday swings as traders tried to price in the binary outcome. If Hormuz reopens, rates correct hard and fast. If it stays closed, rates stay elevated or go higher. Right now, it is staying closed.
The new wrinkle that showed up this week: Iranian officials are now openly discussing disrupting Bab al-Mandeb, the narrow corridor between Yemen and the Horn of Africa that leads into the Red Sea. That would be the second major chokepoint under threat simultaneously. Roughly a quarter of global energy supply passes through one or both of those corridors. This is not a small number.
Where VLCC Rates Actually Stand Right Now
The benchmark Middle East to China VLCC rate hit $423,736 per day in early March, a 94% jump from levels just before the conflict escalated. To give that context, in a normal market those same vessels earn somewhere between $30,000 and $50,000 a day.
The mechanism here is simple but worth spelling out. When Hormuz closes for mainstream Western shipping, two things happen at the same time. Vessels that would normally move crude from the Gulf to Asian refineries in two weeks now have to reroute around the Cape of Good Hope in South Africa, adding 15 to 20 extra sailing days per voyage. Fewer available vessels serving the same cargo volume, combined with longer voyages, means rates go up. War risk insurance premiums compound that effect by making the risk zone prohibitively expensive for most operators.
The compliant fleet, the one that Western tanker operators actually sail, is already smaller than the headline numbers suggest because of shadow fleet vessels that are permanently out of play. That structural tightness makes every disruption hit harder than it would in a world with ample spare capacity.
The Bab al-Mandeb Risk Is Real and It Changes the Math
The Red Sea has been the fallback. Saudi Aramco has been moving some production through the East-West pipeline to Yanbu on the Red Sea coast specifically to avoid Hormuz. Container shipping rerouted the same way earlier this year when Houthi attacks pushed carriers off the Red Sea entirely, only to see them drift back as Cape routing costs compounded.
If Iranian pressure leads to renewed Houthi activity at Bab al-Mandeb while Hormuz stays closed, both of those fallback routes are compromised at the same time. That scenario has not been priced in fully. It is worth watching.
What This Means for Tanker Investors Right Now
The stocks with the most direct exposure to elevated VLCC rates are the ones I watch most closely here at TxZen. Frontline ($FRO), DHT Holdings ($DHT), International Seaways ($INSW), and Teekay Tankers ($TNK) are all operating in an environment where the fundamental rate backdrop is the strongest in decades. The question is not whether the rates are high. They are. The question is how long they stay there and how much of the current rate strength has already been priced into the equities.
I am not going to tell you to buy or sell anything. That is not what this site is for. What I will say is that the market is still pricing in uncertainty around the diplomatic timeline, and any credible sign of a ceasefire framework will hit these stocks hard and fast regardless of what spot rates are doing. The trade has a real binary tail risk.
Keep watching the Bab al-Mandeb situation. That is the next signal.
I will have more analysis in the SteamGauge Weekly signal post later this week. If you want to go deeper on any of the individual names, the Tanker Stocks section is where I break those down.
Not financial advice. Do your own research. I am an investor sharing my own observations on a market I follow closely.